Deloitte sued for $7.6B in mortgage fraud case

“They certainly did not do their job,'' said attorney Steven Thomas, who represents those suing Deloitte. “This is one of those cases where the red flags are staring you in the face, and you've got to do a lot, and they did not.''

Deloitte spokesman Jonathan Gandal responded that the company rejects the claims, calling them “utterly without merit.''

The lawsuits were filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court on behalf of the bankruptcy trustee for the fraudulent mortgage firm, Taylor Bean & Whitaker, and by Ocala Funding LLC, a company that purchased hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of mortgages from Taylor Bean. The bankruptcy trustee is attempting to recover money for Taylor Bean creditors.

The fraud began in 2002 and took multiple forms until Taylor Bean collapsed two years ago. The Ocala-based company shut down after federal agents raided its headquarters in August 2009, which led to the failure of Alabama-based Colonial Bank _ the sixth-largest bank failure in U.S. history.

At its peak, Taylor Bean had about 2,500 employees and had originated some $30 billion in loans as of 2009.

Seven Taylor Bean executives were convicted of federal criminal charges, including former chairman Lee B. Farkas, who was sentenced in June to 30 years in federal prison. Federal prosecutors called the criminal case one of the most significant to arise out of the nation's financial meltdown.

Gandal said the blame for the fraud and losses should rest squarely on Taylor Bean, Ocala Funding and Farkas.

“The bizarre notion that his engines of theft are entitled to complain of injury from their own crimes and to sue the outside auditors they lied to defines common sense, not to mention the law,'' Gandal said on behalf of Deloitte.

According to the lawsuits, Deloitte's certifications of Taylor Bean's books were critical to maintaining its appearance as a legitimate, profitable mortgage business. In fact, the lawsuits contend, Taylor Bean was selling fake or grossly overvalued mortgages, misstating its liabilities and hiding overdrawn bank accounts, among other misdeeds.

“Deloitte missed this fraud because it simply accepted management's conflicting, incomplete and often last-minute explanations of highly-questionable transactions, even though those explanations made no sense and were flatly contradicted by documents in Deloitte's possession,'' one of the lawsuits says.

Deloitte quit as Taylor Bean's auditor in 2009, just as the federal investigations were ramping up.

The Ocala lawsuit includes an e-mail exchange in which Deloitte auditors are raising questions about various financial transactions, including one involving $6 billion that was just being analyzed for the first time a few hours before the deadline for the audit's completion. This “rush to certify'' in the face of possible financial irregularities was another symptom of Deloitte's negligence, the lawsuit contends.